Economics Atlas

How Wealth Is Ordered
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Schools of Thought

English Historical School

Historical and Institutional Economics

The English Historical School was a group of nineteenth-century British economists, including Richard Jones, Thomas Edward Cliffe Leslie, Walter Bagehot, Thorold Rogers, Arnold Toynbee and William Cunningham, who rejected the abstract, deductive method of classical economics associated with David Ricardo in favor of inductive, historically grounded research into how economies actually developed. Rather than deriving universal laws of economic behavior from a small set of assumptions, the school's members compiled detailed statistical and historical studies of prices, wages, industry and institutions, arguing that economic laws are contingent on time, place and social custom. The school flourished roughly from the 1840s through the 1890s, overlapping in outlook, though not in national origin, with the contemporary German Historical School. Its influence receded as the marginalist revolution and the rise of neoclassical economics reasserted a more abstract, deductive style of theorizing in Britain by the turn of the twentieth century, but its historical and statistical methods fed into the later development of economic history as its own discipline. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Disputed
Start Year
1848 1
Sourced to the subject's own accountSources date the school's active period only broadly, as roughly the 1840s to 1890s; 1848 is used here as a representative start within that range rather than a single agreed founding year.
End Year
1890 1
Sourced to the subject's own accountSources give only a broad closing period; the school's influence receded as neoclassical economics became dominant in Britain by the turn of the twentieth century, without a single agreed closing year.
Core TenetSourced to the subject's own account
Economic laws are contingent on historical time, place and social custom, discoverable through inductive, statistical and historical research rather than deduced from a fixed, universal model of the profit-maximizing individual. 1
Connections

Associated With

Source English Historical School of Economics (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. English Historical School of Economics (Wikipedia)
Wikipedia
  • Concepts section
    They rejected the hypothesis of 'the profit maximizing individual' or the 'calculus of pleasure and pain' as the only basis for economic analysis.
  • Influences section
    too formal and as a rationalisation of free-trade policies
  • Time Period section
    influence declining as neoclassical economics became dominant
View the Source
English Historical School of Economics (New World Encyclopedia)
New World EncyclopediaMembers section, Thomas E. Cliffe Leslie
Quote, Members section, Thomas E. Cliffe Leslie
He was considered to be the man who provided "the first systematic statement by an English writer of the philosophic foundation of the historical method" (Ingram 1967).
View the Source
New World Encyclopedia: English historical school of economics
New World EncyclopediaIn Group: Nineteenth-Century Historical Schools, Background
Quote, In Group: Nineteenth-Century Historical Schools, Background
The English Historical School (EHS) considered itself the intellectual heirs of past figures who had emphasized empiricism and induction , such as Francis Bacon , Adam Smith , Auguste Comte , and Herbert Spencer (Cliffe Leslie 1870, Rogers 1880).
View the Source
Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Description

Critics have argued that English historical economics was too diffuse, too lacking in strong leadership, too atheoretical, and too committed to economic history as a discipline to constitute an actual coherent school, even though its members shared an inductive, historically grounded method.

A dissenting reading, from an independent laneEnglish Historical School of Economics (New World Encyclopedia), New World Encyclopedia
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.