The School of Salamanca was a Spanish scholastic movement of theologians and jurists, centered at the University of Salamanca, that produced some of the earliest systematic economic reasoning in the Western tradition. Beginning with the lectures of Francisco de Vitoria in the 1520s, it continued through Domingo de Soto, Martin de Azpilcueta and Luis de Molina. The school argued that the just price of a good arises from its scarcity and the common estimation of buyers and sellers rather than from a seller's cost, labor or risk, an early statement of a subjective, market-based theory of value. It also developed an early quantity theory of money, tracing the price inflation that followed the influx of American silver to the growing money supply, and it relaxed the medieval prohibition on interest by distinguishing legitimate compensation for risk and lost opportunity from usury. Its influence faded as scholastic method gave way to new natural-law and mercantilist writing in the seventeenth century. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Disputed
End YearSourced to the subject's own accountHistorians do not agree on a single closing date; the death of the Jesuit Francisco Suarez in 1617 is a commonly used marker for the end of the school's most productive period, though scholastic economic writing continued afterward in a different key. Start YearSourced to the subject's own account Core TenetSourced to the subject's own accountThe just price of a good is set by its scarcity and the common estimation of the market, not by a seller's cost, labor or risk, an early subjective theory of value paired with an early quantity theory of money. 1 Connections
Associated With
Wikipedia's School of Salamanca article explicitly denies a proven direct influence while affirming the intellectual similarity: written as associated-with rather than influenced-by to match what the source actually claims. The same article reports Murray Rothbard's framing of the Salamanca school as proto-Austrians.
Source Wikipedia
Additional Source School of Salamanca (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)Section 9, The Influence of the School of Salamanca
Open Questions
Source School of Salamanca (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Sources
1. School of Salamanca (Wikipedia)
WikipediaEconomics section
The School of Salamanca has been described as the 'first economic tradition' in the field of economics.
Money, Value and Price section
For the just price arises from the abundance or scarcity of goods, merchants and money ... and not from costs, labour and risk.
Historical context section
The intellectual movement started with Francisco de Vitoria (1483-1546) and Domingo de Soto (1494-1560), both Dominican Thomists.
View the Source Wikipedia
Wikimedia FoundationAssociated With: Austrian School, School of Salamanca, Austrian School comparison passageQuote, Associated With: Austrian School, School of Salamanca, Austrian School comparison passage
Although there does not appear to be any direct influence, the economic thought of the School of Salamanca is in many ways similar to that of the Austrian School.
View the Source School of Salamanca (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Stanford Encyclopedia of PhilosophyAssociated With: Austrian School, Section 9, The Influence of the School of SalamancaQuote, Associated With: Austrian School, Section 9, The Influence of the School of Salamanca
Because of the School's role in the development of economic theory, some economists, including those belonging to the Austrian School of National Economy, refer to them as their ancestors.
View the Source Open Questions (1 open question)
How directly did the School of Salamanca's economic ideas transmit to Enlightenment-era economists such as Cantillon, Turgot and Smith, rather than being independently rediscovered?
Historians credit the School with anticipating subjective value theory and an early quantity theory of money, but the reference literature says it is difficult to give a precise evaluation of the School's influence: later authors, especially Protestant writers hostile to Jesuit and Catholic sources, had ideological motives to conceal where their ideas came from, and even the authorship of Grotius's natural law work was disputed as either original or copied from Suarez and other Spanish authors, showing how credit for this era's ideas was contested and obscured rather than openly traced.
What would resolve this A documented citation chain or manuscript evidence showing a specific later economist (Cantillon, Turgot or Smith) directly read and drew on a named Salamancan text, rather than a general resemblance of ideas.
School of Salamanca (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.