New Keynesian economics is a school of macroeconomics that supplies rigorous microeconomic foundations for Keynesian conclusions, real economic effects from demand shocks, and a role for stabilization policy, using the same rational-expectations toolkit New Classical economists built. Where New Classical models assume markets clear continuously through flexible prices, New Keynesian models assume imperfect competition in price and wage setting, so prices and wages are 'sticky' and adjust only gradually. Stanley Fischer's 1977 sticky-information model and John B. Taylor's 1979-80 staggered wage-setting framework were early formalizations; Guillermo Calvo's 1983 staggered-price-contracts model became the field's standard workhorse. The approach dominates mainstream central-bank macroeconomic modeling today, including the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models most major central banks use for policy analysis.
Facts
Start YearDated to Stanley Fischer's 1977 sticky-information paper, the field's first formal model; Calvo's 1983 staggered-contracts model became the field's later standard. Core TenetRational, forward-looking agents (shared with New Classical economics) combine with imperfect competition and sticky prices and wages (a genuine market failure) to explain why demand shocks have real, persistent effects and why stabilization policy can work. 1 Connections
Associated Figures and Events
Source Joseph Stiglitz (Wikipedia)
Source Paul Krugman (Wikipedia)
Held Differently
New Keynesian economics preserves the original Keynesian conclusion, that demand shocks have real effects and stabilization policy can help, but replaces its ad hoc assumptions with explicit microeconomic foundations original Keynesian theory lacked.
Source Wikipedia
Additional Source Keynesian economics (Wikipedia)Article text
Critiqued Here
Why this is disputed. Both schools share the rational-expectations toolkit; the live dispute is whether markets clear continuously through flexible prices (New Classical) or only gradually because of sticky prices and wages from imperfect competition (New Keynesian), a difference with directly opposed policy implications for whether stabilization policy can work.
Source Wikipedia
Additional Source New Keynesian economics (Wikipedia)Article text
Sources
1. Wikipedia
Wikimedia Foundation
New Keynesian economics (Wikipedia)
New Keynesian economics, lead section
New Keynesian economics is a school of macroeconomics that strives to provide microeconomic foundations for Keynesian economics.
Article text
In particular, New Keynesians assume that there is imperfect competition in price and wage setting to help explain why prices and wages can become "sticky", which means they do not adjust instantaneously to changes in economic conditions.
In Group: Post-Keynesian and New Keynesian Successor Schools, Lead
New Keynesian economics is a school of macroeconomics that strives to provide microeconomic foundations for Keynesian economics.
View the SourcePaul Krugman (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationAssociated Figures and Events: Paul Krugman, Lead sectionQuote, Associated Figures and Events: Paul Krugman, Lead section
In 2008, Krugman was the sole winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences for his contributions to new trade theory and new economic geography.
View the Source Joseph Stiglitz (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationAssociated Figures and Events: Joseph Stiglitz, Lead sectionQuote, Associated Figures and Events: Joseph Stiglitz, Lead section
He is a recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences (2001) and the John Bates Clark Medal (1979).
View the Source Keynesian economics (Wikipedia)
WikipediaAssociated With: Keynesian Economics, Article textQuote, Associated With: Keynesian Economics, Article text
However, by the late 1980s, certain failures of the new classical models, both theoretical (see Real business cycle theory) and empirical (see the "Volcker recession") hastened the emergence of New Keynesian economics, a school that sought to unite the most realistic aspects of Keynesian and neo-classical assumptions and place them on more rigorous theoretical foundation than ever before.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.