Buddhist economics is an approach to economic thought, formulated by the economist E. F. Schumacher beginning with a 1966 essay and popularized in his 1973 collection Small Is Beautiful, that applies Buddhist ethical principles, particularly the reduction of craving and attachment, to economic life. Where conventional economics typically treats the maximization of production, consumption and profit as the measure of success, Buddhist economics takes the reduction of suffering and the maximization of well-being with the least possible use of resources as its organizing goal, treating consumption as a means to human flourishing rather than an end in itself. It emphasizes right livelihood, meaningful and dignified work rather than work treated purely as a cost to be minimized, and it stresses the interdependence of human beings, other species and the natural environment, favoring rates of resource use and consumption that can be sustained rather than maximized in the short run. Later writers, including the Sri Lankan economist Neville Karunatilake, the Thai scholar Prayudh Payutto and the American economist Clair Brown, have extended Schumacher's original essay into a broader body of scholarship. The field remains active today, with academic conferences and a growing literature applying its framework to sustainable consumption and alternatives to gross domestic product as a measure of economic success. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Start YearSourced to the subject's own account Core TenetSourced to the subject's own accountThe goal of economic activity is to maximize human well-being and reduce suffering using the least possible resources, not to maximize production, consumption or profit. 1 Connections
Influenced
Ecological economics' own Wikipedia article credits E.F. Schumacher's Buddhist economics (Small Is Beautiful, 1973) with introducing the non-western, natural-harmony critique of growth-centric measurement that the ecological economics field carries forward; Herman Daly, a founding ecological-economics figure already live on this atlas, is one of the field's best-known carriers of that Schumacher lineage.
Source Wikipedia
Open Questions
Source Buddhist Economics (Schumacher, 1966 essay)E. F. Schumacher
Sources
1. Buddhist Economics (Wikipedia)
WikipediaIntroduction section
The core values of western economics are based in the selfishness of human nature and profit maximization. In Buddhist Economics on the other hand, the driving principle is maximization of wellbeing with minimal use of resources.
General Views section
the driving principle is maximization of wellbeing with minimal use of resources
History section
The term "Buddhist economics" was coined by E. F. Schumacher in 1955, when he travelled to Burma as an economic consultant for Prime Minister U Nu.
In Group: Reform and Religious-Ethical Economic Traditions, Lead
Buddhist economics is a spiritual and philosophical approach to the study of economics.
View the Source Buddhist Economics (Schumacher, 1966 essay)
E. F. Schumacher, 1966paragraph on the threefold function of workQuote, paragraph on the threefold function of work
The Buddhist point of view takes the function of work to be at least threefold: to give man a chance to utilise and develop his faculties; to enable him to overcome his ego-centredness by joining with other people in a common task; and to bring forth the goods and services needed for a becoming existence.
View the Source Wikipedia
Wikimedia FoundationInfluenced: Ecological Economics, Ecological economics, non-western economic ideas passageQuote, Influenced: Ecological Economics, Ecological economics, non-western economic ideas passage
E.F. Schumacher introduced examples of non-western economic ideas to mainstream thought in his book, Small is Beautiful, where he addresses neoliberal economics through the lens of natural harmony in Buddhist economics.
View the Source Open Questions (1 open question)
Is Buddhist economics best understood as a rival analytical framework to neoclassical economics, or as a normative ethical critique that deliberately operates outside standard economic methodology?
In the founding 1966 essay, Schumacher explicitly declines to engage with the methodological dispute, writing "We need not, however, get involved in arguments of methodology," while also describing conventional economists as suffering from "a kind of metaphysical blindness" in treating their discipline as free of values and presuppositions. This leaves open whether Buddhist economics offers testable alternative propositions about economic behavior or is primarily a value framework for critiquing conventional economics from outside its methodology.
What would resolve this A body of Buddhist-economics scholarship stating falsifiable propositions or formal models comparable to mainstream economic theory, rather than normative restatements of Buddhist ethical principles applied to economic life.
E. F. Schumacher, Buddhist Economics (Schumacher, 1966 essay)
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.